The pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to resign has surged in the 48 hours since Labour's catastrophic local election results, and on Monday evening Bassetlaw's Labour MP Jo White intervened with one of the sharpest backbench attacks on the government so far. Her Telegraph opinion piece, headlined "Starmer has made voters feel gaslit and devalued", accuses the Prime Minister of running a government that has actively communicated to pensioners, farmers and disabled people that it does not like them. But — and this matters — she does not call for him to resign. She says replacing the Prime Minister would entirely miss the point.

At a glance
- Who: Jo White, Labour MP for Bassetlaw, chair of the Red Wall Group of around 35 Labour backbenchers
- Where: Telegraph opinion, 8:05pm BST, Monday 11 May 2026
- Headline framing: Starmer has made voters feel "gaslit and devalued"
- Does she call for Starmer to resign? No — she explicitly writes that "this isn't about a beauty contest" and changing the PM would "entirely miss the point"
- Does she back his current direction? No — she calls it a "London-centric" disconnect from the Midlands and the North, and says Labour's promise of a "new way of doing things" was "far too quickly bogged down by sleaze and jobs for friends"
- Specific policy targets: Winter fuel allowance cuts (pensioners), inheritance tax (farmers), welfare reforms (disabled people)
- What she's calling for instead: Industrial strategy investment in post-industrial towns, an elected House of Lords, sustained NHS investment, asylum processing in the Middle East / Horn of Africa, Obama-style town hall meetings by the PM and Cabinet
- Local hook: Bassetlaw voters slammed doors in MPs' faces on polling day; some told canvassers to "f--- off"
Her stance — clearly
This is the bit that's getting lost in the wider "should Starmer resign" coverage today, so it's worth being precise.
Jo White is not calling for a leadership change. The closest she comes is to say that "Keir will only succeed if he breaks out of his comfort zone" — i.e. he could still succeed, on her account, if he changes how he governs. Her central line on the leadership question reads: "If anyone thinks it's just about changing the Prime Minister, they entirely miss the point. This isn't about a beauty contest; this must be about fundamental change to get to where we need to be."
What she is calling for is a structural reset: a shift in how Labour governs, where it invests, and which voters it pays attention to. The Prime Minister, on her account, is part of the problem — but so is the entire Cabinet and the "Westminster bubble" of policy-makers. Her words: "Ministers are equally culpable."
The core argument — what she actually means
White's diagnosis is that Labour, over its first two years in power, has gone looking for groups of voters to blame for the country's problems — and that the message has landed exactly the wrong way. Her three named examples:
- Pensioners heard "we don't like you" when the government "snatched their winter fuel allowance", in her phrasing.
- Farmers got the same message via inheritance-tax changes.
- Disabled people got it via welfare reforms.
The fear among other groups, she writes, is "it's you who are next for a good kick". She frames the cumulative effect as a government that "doesn't do politics" — a contrast with the Blair era and Alastair Campbell's famous "we don't do religion" line.
The deeper claim is that the government's whole value system is calibrated to a "London-centric" version of British life — 24-hour public transport, ten or more hospitals to choose from, good schools within walking distance — and that this is fundamentally disconnected from "the towns and communities of the Midlands and the North". White writes: "We are literally living different lives, and these lives are being ignored."
The Bassetlaw doorstep evidence
The piece is rooted in specific reports from her own constituency. White writes that on polling day last Thursday "doors were closed on our faces" — and that in other places Labour campaigners "were roared at and told to f--- off". She also says it was trade unionists — historically Labour's core vote — who switched to Reform UK and occasionally the Green Party at Thursday's elections.
Bassetlaw itself was not voting on Thursday (the district is on a fallow year in its four-year cycle), but White's MPs and councillors were canvassing alongside Labour campaigns in neighbouring authorities, and her coffee mornings across the constituency continue to give her direct contact with Bassetlaw voters.
What she's actually asking for
White's piece sets out six concrete demands — none of which involve Starmer stepping down:
- Obama-style town hall meetings — the PM and Cabinet members hearing voters directly
- Industrial strategy rebalanced toward post-industrial towns — specifically through the Defence Investment Plan, with munitions factories, R&D facilities and supply chains sited outside London and with procurement that prioritises Britain
- Cost-of-living action targeted at "key workers" — factory and warehouse staff she says feel forgotten while the government, she writes, focuses on those "who choose not to work"
- An elected House of Lords — and an end to the Prime Minister's right to nominate peers
- Sustained NHS investment — restoring it as Labour's "one major public-service guarantee"
- Asylum claims processed at "the nearest point of safety" — designated centres in the Middle East or Horn of Africa, with claims by small-boat arrival made illegal. She backs Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood's "whatever it takes" position.
Why this matters in the resignation context

The wider political backdrop is that pressure is mounting on Sir Keir Starmer to resign or face a leadership challenge after Thursday's election losses. National coverage in the past 24 hours has speculated about an exit timetable, gilt yields have moved, and Cabinet ministers have been publicly defending the Prime Minister.
White's intervention is significant because she stops short of joining that call. She is the chair of the Red Wall Group — the 35-strong bloc most likely to put structural pressure on the leadership — and her decision to focus on policy direction rather than a personnel change is, in its own way, a signal. It tells the Prime Minister that the most organised backbench grouping wants concessions on direction, not a contest. Whether the rest of her group agrees is the next question — and one likely to be answered in the coming days.
For Bassetlaw readers there is a sharper local angle: UK Polling Report's current model has Jo White's own seat flipping from Labour to Reform UK at the next general election. White is writing one of the loudest backbench critiques of her own government from a seat that, on current projections, she would not hold.
Background you should know
Jo White was elected as Labour MP for Bassetlaw at the July 2024 general election. She is married to Lord John Mann, the Labour peer who was Bassetlaw's Labour MP from 2001 to 2019 before stepping down from the Commons and being elevated to the House of Lords. She founded and now chairs the Red Wall Group of around 35 Labour backbenchers from seats Labour won back from the Conservatives at the last general election.
Her previous interventions include a May 2025 Telegraph piece urging the Prime Minister to "stop pussyfooting around", criticism of the winter fuel allowance changes, and a public call for faster closure of asylum hotels.
Source: Jo White MP, "Starmer has made voters feel gaslit and devalued", The Telegraph, published 11 May 2026, 8:05pm BST. All quotations are short verbatim extracts; longer passages are paraphrased with attribution. Reader comments cited are public Telegraph user contributions on the same article.
